CFD analysis of thrust vectoring nozzle
Abstract
Today, thrust vectoring has become very important research subject which
can dramatically change the way aircraft maneuvering in the future and their
performance .It can control vehicles attitude and flight path, so it reduces
the dependability on the primary control surfaces .We will do flow analysis
through deflecting nozzle at different angles and by that we determine
aerodynamic coefficients .And then we'll get optimum angles from different maneuvering positions.
Introduction
flow analysis of thrust vectoring nozzle, this
work will help to know the effects of thrust vectoring nozzle on engine flow
and parameters.
EFFECT
Thrust
vectoring can control vehicles attitude and flight path and it reduces the dependability
on the primary control surfaces so, flow analysis of thrust vectoring helps to
know their performance.
Objective
of thrust vectoring
·
To give higher
maneuvering and agility to aircrafts.
·
To decrease dependability
on aero parts.
Reference
I had taken SATURN AL-31 engine as
reference for thrust vectoring nozzle.
How thrust vectoring nozzle is
working?
There are many ways for vectoring of
thrust but we choose engine having three ring system for thrust vectoring
analysis. Three ring system is controlled by 4 actuators, By moving of ring
forward and backward yawing and pitching of aircraft is controlled. (For three
ring system we had taken reference of “Thrust Vectoring Nozzle for Modern Military
Aircraft”
By Daniel Ikaza)
Data from SATRUN AL-31
›
Ring diameter: 660mm
›
Ring length:150mm
›
Flap section total
length:433mm
›
Nozzle diameter:630mm
›
Nozzle total length:853mm
›
Turbine inlet
temperature: 1685K
›
Overall pressure ratio:
23
From
that data and basic propulsion techniques we had calculated,
Nozzle inlet
temperature: 774.268K
Pressure
at nozzle inlet: 102000pa
Modeling
We had used CATIA software for modeling
of geometry and created thrust vectoring nozzle.
From here flaps aren’t used for
analysis. Then we had make 7 different geometries those are at
I.
Maximum thrust condition
II.
15’ nozzle flaps
deflection
III.
10’ nozzle flaps
deflection
IV.
Pitch up
V.
Pitch down
VI.
Moving right
As three ring system used for
controlling flaps will not affect individually they functions as a whole unit
and the area created by that unit is directly affect the flow.
Meshing
We had used ANSYS software for meshing
of model, meshing is required for discretization of model for CFD analysis.
No. of nodes: 88283
No. of elements: 462511
Mesh quality
Quality of generated mesh plays
significant role in numerical computation, mesh quality can checked from
skewness, orthogonal quality, and aspect ratio of mesh.
Skewness
Mesh skewness is one of the most
important features that determines the quality of mesh, skewness is basically
defined on the geometrical orientation of a mesh.
Skewness tends to zero indicates good
quality of mesh. And as per chart most of elements having skewness nearer to
zero mesh quality is good.
Grid independency test
Solution of CFD problem relay on mesh,
so such mesh resolution required in which solution is independent from mesh
resolution. This test gives best mesh resolution which is compatible for
solution,
In our case we had calculated the
solution for different element sizing of 20mm, 15mm, 10mm, 5mm
Element size
|
No of elements
|
Jet exit velocity
|
20mm
|
142602
|
599.524 m/s
|
15mm
|
191455
|
601.36 m/s
|
10mm
|
462511
|
602.38 m/s
|
5mm
|
2071558
|
602.41 m/s
|
Equation of thrust
Thrust can be calculated by,
T= (Ma+Mf)*Vj
- (Ma)*Vi
Vj =jet exit velocity
Ma =mass flow rate of air
Mf =mass flow rate of fuel
Vi =engine inlet velocity
Solution
Vector contours for maximum thrust
design
Shear
Velocity
Vector contour for pitch up design
Pressure
Shear
Velocity
From these vector contours we can get
idea about pressure, shear and velocity distribution over the nozzle in
different maneuvering positions.
Results
Nozzle inlet temperature is 774K and
nozzle inlet pressure is 102000Pa, for getting results of thrust we had
obtained value of Ma and Mf theoretically by jet propulsion techniques.
Ma=148.6758 kg/s
Mf=4.078 kg/s
Position
|
Cd
|
Cl
|
Jet exit velocity(Vj)
|
Thrust force by nozzle
|
Force Perpendicular to axis by nozzle
|
Maximum thrust 20’
|
0.583
|
0.000326
|
602 m/s
|
74.5kN
|
0kN
|
Nozzle flaps angle15’
|
0.599
|
0.000069
|
402 m/s
|
43.948kN
|
0kN
|
Nozzle flaps angle10’
|
0.746
|
0.000011
|
274.8 m/s
|
24.517kN
|
0kN
|
Pitching up
|
0.899
|
-0.759
|
628.2 m/s
|
71.7kN
|
31.93kN(in +Y direction causes lift)
|
Pitching down
|
1.10
|
0.718
|
625.6 m/s
|
71.7kN
|
31.93kN(in -Y direction causes lift)
|
Moving right
|
0.295
|
0.000262
|
628.2 m/s
|
71.7kN
|
31.93kN(in +X direction causes yaw)
|
Moving left
|
1.172
|
0.000282
|
628.2 m/s
|
71.7kN
|
31.93(in -X direction causes yaw)
|
Here, graph relates jet exit velocity
at different nozzle deflection angle
Conclusion
·
From these project we had
calculated the values of lift coefficients, drag coefficients, thrust, lifting
and yawing forces for different maneuverings positions.
·
Maximum thrust can
obtains at 20’ nozzle deflection so that is optimum angle.
·
Vectoring of flow creates
a force in flight direction and as well as in yaw/lift direction that causes
moving in that direction.
Literature references
› E.A. Wilson,D.Alder and P.Z. Bar-Joseph., “Axisymmetric
Thrust-vectoring nozzle performance prediction”
› “From their study on performance of TV nozzle, they
calculated dynamic TV-nozzle geometry and performances at the critical flow
point, so it can be use in future TV-nozzle design to reduce costly
experimental investigations, may be implemented for TV-nozzle performances to
enhance defense simulation, as well as provide initial conditions for numerical
VSTOL/TV jet performance studies.”
› Daniel Ikaza “Thrust Vectoring nozzle for military aircraft
engines”
› “From his study we get information about ITP’s thrust vectoring
nozzle program and also get information about mechanical actuation of thrust
vector nozzle”.
Jordaar
ReplyDelete